Conspiracy Planet




There's No "Theory" in Criminal Conspiracy

Saturday, May 26, 2018

Home | Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives Channel
#1 Public Enemy
9-11: Conspiracy
9-11: Coverup
9-11: Crime
9-11: Enemy Within
9-11: Unanswered Questions
9-11: Who Benefits?
Abortion Industry/ Human Organ Trade
Al Martin
Alan Cantwell
Avian Flu/ Anthrax Scam
Bad Law, Bad Judges
Beyond the Beyond
Bush-Clinton Crime Family
Celebrity Conspiracy
Chemtrails/ Geo-Engineering
Cheney/Halliburton Fraud
CIA (Criminals In Action)
CIA Drug Trafficking
Cops Gone Wild
Corporate-Govt Fraud
Criminal Government
Crop Circle Mystery
Culture (sic)
Cyber Warfare
DoJ (sic)
Drone Wars
Dyncorp Crimes
Enron Money Laundry
FDA-Big Pharma Fraud-Conspiracy
Federal Reserve Scam
Fraud (Financial)
Fraud (Military)
GMO-Genetic Engineering/ Genetically Modified Food
Google Frauds, Scams & Conspiracy
Google Lawsuit Archives
Gulf Oil Disaster
Happy News
History Recovered
Income Tax Slavery
Iraq (Nam)
Israel/ Zionism
Japan Nuclear Disaster
Jewish Heroes
Julian Robertson Lawsuit Archives
Killer Spooks
Media Liars
Media Whores
Michael Riconosciuto
Military Guinea Pigs
Military Tech
Mind Control
Moon Landing Scam
National ID Cards/ Microchips/ RFID
Native American
New World Order
Osama bin Scapegoat
Pentagon Fraud
Phony "Conservatives"
Phony "Progressives"
Phony Global War on Terror (GWOT)
Phony Religion
Phony War on Drugs
Phony War on 'Terrorism'
Princess Diana: Murder-Coverup
Prison/ Slave Labor Industry
Resist War
Ron Paul
Suppressed Science
TSA: Govt Sex Offenders
UFO Disclosure
US Police State
USA PATRIOT Act (Treason)
Vaccination Scam
Voodoo Science
Vote Fraud
War on Gold
Weather Warfare
Whistleblower: James Casbolt
Whistleblower: Oswald LeWinter
Whistleblower: Rodney Stich
Whistleblower: Sue Arrigo, M.D.
News   Links   Forum  

Billionaire Julian Robertson Skips Court Again  (continued)

Billionaire Julian Robertson Skips Court Again

There are 3 issues that could lead a reasonable person to conclude abuse of judicial process by plaintiff Julian Robertson's attorney Richard Marooney of King & Spalding. These are the questions that Mr. Marooney should be asked. How about...

1. Improper service

2. Filing a lawsuit with no basis in fact or in law and which, since the beginning, has been in the wrong venue.

3. Breaching the contract regarding the retraction of alleged defamatory article

This case has been systematic pseudo-legal intimidation and harassment by a rich old man, the plaintiff -- billionaire and failed Tiger hedge fund manager Julian Robertson.

(By the way, Mr. Marooney – where is your client today?)

This case is abuse of judicial process and further evidence that Julian Robertson uses the law to intimidate any criticism of his financial malfeasance.

This case is also a First Amendment issue since it involves a public figure, who is notoriously ill-tempered and litigation-happy.

Robertson has made himself a public figure by his frequent media appearances on business news channels and in newsprint.

Procedurally the judgment of the lower court is a chilling of constitutional rights, since the requirements for filing a frivolous lawsuit are so low. Meanwhile this case has been an emotional and financial hardship on me and my family defending myself and my company against unproven allegations. It should be noted that Robertson did not claim or attest to any losses of any sort – and never has to this day.

I am an independent journalist and publisher. I am the press and I am pro se. Robertson on the other hand is a billionaire and a public figure who has a history of filing meritless lawsuits.

I had a valid substantive defense, but because of faulty procedures, the lower court punished me with extreme sanctions and a summary judgment. My supposed non-compliance was nothing compared to Robertson's stone-walling regarding my discovery. His attorney Richard Marooney wouldn't even tell me if Robertson is actually in New York. Or not.

This is salient to proper venue which the lower court to this day has still not ruled on.

I did in fact comply with the court’s request, but it may be that the plaintiff and plaintiff's attorney are not computer literate and misled the court.

This is an egregious lawsuit on the face of it and should be dismissed. Robertson and his attorney have not produced a single shred of evidence supporting their allegations.

Then there are the lower court's procedural oversights or errors.

For whatever reason, during the discovery request, the lower court's decision resulted in extreme sanctions against me, even as my requests for discovery were ignored -- especially regarding venue.

I'm not a lawyer, but I understand it's important that I'm in the right jurisdiction. For whatever reason, the lower court has ignored or overlooked my request to dismiss my case or move the case to Montana, the defendants' residence.

The lower court to date has still not made a ruling on proper venue.
Then there's Mr. Marooney's missing client, Julian Robertson, who didn’t even show up, in spite of court orders for both parties

Was it because he doesn't live here anymore? Is it because this was a nuisance lawsuit he filed just because he could? Or is it because he just doesn’t care enough?

This is a frivolous and cynical lawsuit and that's why this is clearly abuse of the federal judiciary.

So who was in court? Mr. Marooney for the plaintiff. Uri for the respondent. But the court did not ask -- Mr. Marooney, where's you client?

The case should have been dismissed when Mr. Robertson didn’t show up in court.

This case is a another frivolous action by Robertson disguised as legal extortion.

In fact, Mr. Robertson’s recent poor track record as a hedge fund manager may have prompted this frivolous lawsuit against me. He allegedly lost $17 billion in client funds in 2000. He then sued Business Week Magazine for $1 billion because it was a nice round number, he said.

There are 3 primary issues why this judgment of the lower court should be reversed and/ or vacated. These can be characterized as either oversights or egregious errors.

1. Incorrect venue

2. Extreme sanctions (default judgment) against the defendant due to incomplete discovery

3. Hearsay testimony by William Goodell allowed by magistrate court

As I said in my brief --

1. The district court abused its discretion by not responding to numerous motions by defendants regarding proper venue, even though defendants have no nexus in New York and plaintiff is not domiciled there, but indeed lives in New Zealand.

2. The district court abused its discretion by sanctioning defendants -- but not plaintiff -- for incomplete discovery issues and then issuing a default judgment against defendants.

3. The magistrate court abused its discretion by allowing hearsay testimony by a non-expert witness, Robertson's employee William Goodell, while plaintiff Julian Robertson, ignoring the court order to attend, was absent at the inquest hearing and not available for direct or cross-examination to verify the facts of the case.


Other Top Stories

Julian Robertson Lawsuit Heads to Supreme Court by CONSPIRACY PLANET
Billionaire Julian Robertson Skips Court Again by CONSPIRACY PLANET
Julian Robertson Frivolous Lawsuit Heads to Court by CONSPIRACY PLANET
Hedge Fund Loser Julian Robertson: Next Round by CONSPIRACY PLANET
Julian Robertson Refuses Mental Exam by URI DOWBENKO
Court Orders Discovery for Julian Robertson by URI DOWBENKO
Book: AIDS &The Doctors of Death by Alan Cantwell
Book: All Tomorrows Parties by William Gibson
Book: 'Bible Fraud' by Tony Bushby
Book: 'Bushwhacked' by Uri Dowbenko
Book: 'Conspirators' by Al Martin
Book: Death in the Air by Leonard Horowitz
Book: 'Future War' by John Alexander
Book: Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse
Book: 'Judaism's Strange Gods'
Book: 'Not In His Image' by John Lash
Book: Not in His Image/ Video: Avatar
Book: 'Paperclip Dolls' by Annie McKenna
Book: 'Rule by Secrecy' by Jim Marrs
Book: Rulers of Evil by Tupper Saussy
Book: 'Secret Weapons' by Ted Schwarz
Book: Thanks for the Memories
Book: 'The Templars and the Assassins'
Book: 'Windswept House' by Malachi Martin
Book:'Defrauding America'by Rodney Stich
Books:'The Lexus & The Olive Tree by Tom Friedman
Video: 'Arlington Road'
Video: 'Avatar'
Video: 'Collateral Damage'
Video: 'Confidence'
Video: 'Fight Club'
Video: Passion of the Christ
Video: 'The Manchurian Candidate'
Video: Traffic
Video: Transcendence
Videos: AntiTrust
Videos: 'The Patriot'
Wanted: Gen-X Spooks

Click Here!
Click Here!
Click Here!

Copyright ©2013 Conspiracy Planet; All Rights Reserved